Categories
Activism Featured News Statement Testimony Videos

Motion To Assume Independent Jurisdiction [CNP v. R.]

In the name of Jehovih, the Almighty Creator, Canadian Nationalist Party Leader Travis Patron motions to the court for jurisdiction independent of the English Crown (and heirs in perpetuity) on the grounds they are neglecting contractual obligations contained within the Magna Carta of 1215.

Between: Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. (plaintiff) & English Crown (defendant)
Proceeding Court: Canadian Nationalist Party Common Law Tribunal
Location: Redvers, Saskatchewan
File Number: CNPCLT13744

The Court Of Queen’s Bench has yet to decide if Canadian Nationalist Party Leader Travis Patron should be granted leave to represent the corporation in their claim that they were unconstitutionally excluded from the recent 43rd Federal Election.

The Canadian Nationalist Party referenced an application to the court during a Court Of Queen’s Bench For Saskatchewan hearing on Thursday, November 5th, 2020 that the current name on file, Mr. Travis Patron, be granted leave to continue serving as lawyer in the civil action against the City Of Saskatoon. Mr. Patron is a practitioner of law. He also has direct experience related to the claim contained in the lawsuit and is acting under the lawful provisions contained within the Magna Carta of 1215 seeking justice in this claim. The Magna Carta of 1215 has been listed as applicable legislation in this claim and shall not go unnoticed. The Magna Carta is lawfully binding upon the Crown today, over 800 years after it was sealed at Runnymede by King John on June 15th, 1215 in the seventeenth year of his reign.

This agreement is to be observed in good faith by heirs of the throne of England, the current heir being our Head Of State, Queen Elizabeth II.

The Magna Carta was successfully invoked in accordance with Clause 61 on March 23rd, 2001, and continues to embody the supreme law of the whole realm today. All citizens of the realm have a lawful duty to recognize this agreement until the Crown has made redress. Any Crown Agent who, when called upon, fails to honour this treaty may be held criminally liable for aiding and abetting High Treason.

The Canadian Nationalist Party hereby reiterates that they identify with the English Church as described in the Magna Carta of 1215:

“First, that we have granted to God, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished and its liberties unimpaired. That we wish this so to be observed, appears from the fact that of our own free will, before the outbreak of the present dispute between us and our barons, we granted and confirmed by charter the freedom of the Church’s elections – a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance to it – and caused this to be confirmed by Pope Innocent III. This freedom we shall observe ourselves, and desire to be observed in good faith by our heirs in perpetuity.”

  • King John, English Crown, June 15th, 1215, Runnymede, Magna Carta

And further claim the following religious right:

“God said: Whoso liveth with Jehovih is free from Jehovih. These need no man’s government; for they practice righteousness, peace, love, industry and wisdom, with due regard to one another. Such is the Father’s kingdom on earth. In which there shall be no laws made by man; neither shall there be leaders or rulers. The progress of man is toward this; the progress of governments of man should shape toward such a consummation. The time was, when laws were requisite unto all things, even to the manner of a man coming in and going out of a house; and to every occupation that man followed; with licenses and taxes regulating them; the time of apprenticeship to a barber, to a weaver, to a lawyer, to a preacher, to a physician, to a smith, and to all other trades and occupations with examinations and passports to practice within the king’s dominions; with rates for fees and rights and privileges. But these laws and governments were for the past eras; they were righteous in the first place, for they shaped man’s judgement toward perfecting himself. But, behold, a new time is in the world; from the acquisition of knowledge a new liberty hath been born into the world. And it crieth out on every side: Throw open the doors unto all trades and occupations; behold, the multitude are sufficiently wise to judge themselves as to whom they shall patronize. Judgement is rendered against the laws and governments of man in all cases where they prevent the liberty and choice of man to his avocation and knowledge. It is not sufficient for thee to say: Behold, the public will be taken advantage of by ignorant pretenders. Thou hast no right to say what the public will suffer, and thus base a law on prospective damage. When the public have suffered, and when they themselves, demand protection by such laws, then shall such laws be made. To make such laws beforehand, is to sin against Jehovih.”

  • OAHSPE, Book Of Judgement, Chapter XXXV, verse 1-9

Mr. Patron holds sole directorship of the corporate entity Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. and is best suited to act on behalf of the corporation in public affairs. The Canadian Nationalist Party is a federally-sanctioned political party with Mr. Patron acting as Chief Agent and Party Leader. As current Sole Director, Chief Agent, and Party Leader there is no person better suited than Mr. Patron to act as lawyer on file and make decisions as it pertains to public representation of the Canadian Nationalist Party.

Denying Mr. Patron the ability to continue serving as lawyer on file given the provisions contained within the Magna Carta with regard to rights and liberties of the Church, would represent an impairment of our religious freedom.

It would also be neglectful of the inherent dignity of the human person and damage public confidence in social and political institutions which are designed to enhance participation in society.

The allegations against the current administration are most serious for the democratic and constitutional integrity of Canadian society. The Canadian Nationalist Party was not permitted to assemble publicly and communicate their policies during the recent 43rd Federal Election (September 11th – October 21st, 2019). Every request was denied. This exclusion provides reasonable grounds to claim that the Government Of Canada has failed to uphold their democratic mandate.

The City Of Saskatoon has already refused to honour the Canadian Nationalist Party’s request to host a public event on City Hall premises to communicate their policies during the recent 43rd Federal Election due to their denominational nature. A further refusal to grant the current lawyer on file, Travis Patron, to continue acting as such, represents a continuation of impairment of their religious freedom.

In accordance with Clause 40 of the Magna Carta, the Crown must not delay nor deny right or justice to any citizen of the realm.

These combined circumstances of delaying Canadian Nationalist Party Leader Travis Patron’s application to represent the corporation as lawyer in their civil action (a religious right) after being unconstitutionally excluded from the recent 43rd Federal Election represents a failure to honour the contractual provisions contained within the Magna Carta of 1215.

Being a member of the Law Society Of Saskatchewan is not an absolute requirement to represent a corporation in a court of law.

In the name of Jehovih, the Heavenly Father, the Canadian Nationalist Party is motioning to the Common Law for jurisdiction independent of the English Crown and current heirs in perpetuity as a remedy in this claim.

May the Heavenly Host with the authority to arbitrate between the Canadian Nationalist Party and English Crown do so with grace and righteousness.

Sworn by on this 1st day of December, 2020 in Redvers, Saskatchewan:

Travis Patron, Canadian Nationalist Party Leader

More information can be found at CNP v. R.

Case Information:

Applicable Legislation:

Contact Information & Address For Service:

Plaintiff:
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc.
ATTN: Party Leader Travis Patron, Chief Agent
PO Box 490, Redvers, SK, S0C 2H0
+1(306)840-7132
www.nationalist.ca

Defendant:

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, English Crown
ATTN: Governor General Julie Payette, Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
Rideau Hall, 1 Sussex Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0A1
+1(613)993-8200
www.gg.ca

Categories
Activism Featured News Statement

Mandatory Masks At School Are Not Cool

Last week, the South East Corner Stone School Division accused Canadian Nationalist Party Leader Travis Patron of “rude or indecent” behavior when he visited Redvers School to inquire and object about their mandatory mask policy. This week, he is responding to that accusation.
  1. Southeast Cornerstone School Division Letter – Superintendent
  2. Southeast Cornerstone School Division Response Letter – Travis Patron

TO:
Kevin Hengen
Superintendent of Schools East Service Area
South East Cornerstone Public School Division
80A-18th Street Northeast,
Weyburn, Saskatchewan
S4H 2W4

FROM:
Travis Patron
Canadian Nationalist Party
PO Box 490,
Redvers, Saskatchewan
S0C 2H0

DATE: Monday, November 30th, 2020

South East Cornerstone Public School Division – Response Letter

Mr. Superintendent,

This is an acknowledgement that we have received your recent letter referencing a potential violation of s. 367 of The Education Act, 1995 by alleging acting with rude or indecent behaviour when we attended the Redvers School on Tuesday, November 24th, 2020. Let me first and foremost object to the accusation that we conducted ourselves rudely or indecently. We have not. There is nothing rude or indecent about objecting to an unconstitutional provincial mandate requiring the use of masks in public schools. There is nothing rude or indecent about raising one’s voice in the face of oppression either, and this is how we currently characterize the government administration at the provincial level and beyond.

In March of this year, we served the Government Of Saskatchewan a Notice Of Objection in regard to their declared state of emergency on the grounds that is it unprecedented and unnecessary and that it has a high probability of causing undo suppression of our economic conditions – especially in rural areas of the province. We believe these words to be self-evident today and intend on continuing to stand in objection to this declared state of emergency.

We interpret your immediate decision to prohibit us from entering the school or being on school property in response to our activism (read: inquiring in-person about a public schools mask policy) as relatively undiplomatic and perhaps even unbecoming of a superintendent dealing with a federal party leader headquartered in the municipality. No effort to listen to our perspective or address our questions has been made whatsoever. This is disappointing to us.

Mandating masks in public facilities, including for staff and students at school is uncalled for and unnecessary unless the current government administration is able to justify them.

I’m willing to bet that if an anonymous poll were held today, the majority of students and staff alike would vehemently reject mandatory masks.

As an alumni, this is not the first time I’ve raised my voice at Redvers School in objection to something I believe to be fundamentally wrong (mandatory masks) and if I have my way, it most certainly won’t be the last …

Sincerely,

Travis Patron, Canadian Nationalist Party Leader
Categories
Activism Featured Release

Now Available: Canadian Nationalist Party Handbook


CNP Handbook

$0

Free

The Canadian Nationalist Party (CNP) Handbook is a primer for those interested in learning more about our political movement and activism.

This volume is publicly available in accordance with the following religious text:

“And ye shall take neither money, nor script for your labour, but be an example of faith in the promises of God.” – OAHSPE, Book Of Judgement, Chapter XIX, verse 3

Category: