Canadian Nationalist Party

Sometimes what is necessary is also unpopular. Sometimes what needs to be said is an uncomfortable truth.

In Canada, what we have been sold is a disgusting lie. The lie we have been sold is that transitioning away from a nation state (as we had prior to Pierre Trudeau (1968)), and instead adopting multicultural globalism, is going to enhance our way of life.

That diversifying our ethnic portfolio is a strength …

Now, with enough of a track record to examine, we undeniably arrive at the conclusion that we have been taken advantage of through a series of political lies and media cover-ups. What is now in jeopardy is the very fabric of middle class society. The rich continue to plunder our once prosperous nation, and the middle class now find necessities such as education, healthcare, transportation, and housing to be increasingly unaffordable. Even worse, our public media broadcaster (CBC) and other mainstream media outlets, glaze over this gradual economic impoverishment as though it is insignificant, as though it is not for the average Canadian to know they are not alone in working longer and harder for less, and that the employment prospects for their children are now bleaker than what they themselves inherited. If the mainstream media were trustworthy, this topic would be a priority.

Instead, we are impressed with the notion that everything is business as usual and everything is being taken care of by someone other than you. Don’t involve yourself or investigate, just obey. Blindly. Don’t ask too many questions, just keep your head down and trust that someone you hardly know is working for your benefit …

What Canadians must soon realize is that they have been had. That their trust is a powerful thing, where they choose to invest it matters, and the vision they have bought into has been a dirty trick.

We, as Canadians, cannot afford to accommodate the “post-national” vision that Ottawa has in store for us. Our socialized welfare system cannot accommodate such demand. These puppet politicians know this, but because they are not loyal to their electors, they care not. There is hardly any consequence for betraying their trust. Look for a Member of Parliament today who might be called a “man of the people” and you won’t find anyone. Instead, you will find a quiet dictatorship disguised as a democracy – with the two major parties owned and controlled by the same hidden hand.

We cannot afford to continue immigrating ethnic ideologies which are incompatible with our traditional way of life. Canada was founded as a Roman Catholic mission. If we are to survive, we must return to this ideal. Thus, we should not be accommodating values that conflict with this heritage.

We should have no reservation in professing the Roman Catholic rite as provided to us in our constitution. Practices contrary to the faith (such as same-sex marriage, abortion, testifying falsely against a neighbor, government not observing the Sabbath, idol worship, adultery and pre-marital sex) should be punished and socially discouraged by the public.

The denomination must take precedence is all public affairs.

The only thing we have left is our faith. Nothing else matters.

I have been asked by Canadian peace officers regarding my position on using violence as a means of generating social change. In this entry, I will briefly outline my position on violence because it is an important topic.

Understand: not only should violence not be used in furtherance of political change, but it cannot be used to effect political change. I mean this quite literally: if the action is violent, it will not be effective at creating the desired change. The work will not be secure.

This is so because violence is inherently unlawful. Violence is, by it’s very definition, a violation of the law. The question is not whether or not violence should be used, but rather, what exactly constitutes violence given the social context of the situation.

For example, if someone smashes you with a tennis racket unprovoked, physically restraining them is not violent. However, in the absence of being assaulted with the tennis racket, such actions would be unreasonable, and therefore, violent.

Thus we see that the primary test in determining whether something is violent is one of proportionality. What is reasonable is not violent, despite the amount of force used, and what is violent must, by definition, exceed the limits of proportionality.

In the court of law, the operating mind of the person is weighted and measured as to the reasonableness of their actions. The mentality (mensus) that resides most closely to the will of God will always win in the end.

An accused person is not guilty unless they themselves harbour a guilty mentality (nemo reus est nisi mens sit rea).

In the same line of thought, criminal activity cannot be solved by committing crimes of a greater severity. Peace cannot be achieved through warfare. And a fire cannot be tamed by fanning the flames.

The only true failure is capitulating to the opinions of those who have no standing in the Church.

Modern society, especially Western Society, sooner opts to do what is easy rather than what it knows is right. This, more than any other behavior, is the cause of it’s decline.

The fighting spirit demands that personal sacrifices be made for the greater good, and sometimes, what is right is also unpopular.

Unless modern society realizes this, it will continue to decay until the standard of living it once knew is but a distant memory.