Canadian Nationalist Party (CNP)

The plaintiff (Canadian Nationalist Party) is today motioning to the court for summary judgement regarding their claim that the defendant (English Crown) has committed breach of contract by failing to defend the rights and liberties of the Church as described in the Magna Carta of 1215.

Court proceedings come through a Common Law Tribunal formed on April 28^th, 2020 by public declaration served to the municipality of Redvers, district of Souris – Moose Mountain, Province Of Saskatchewan, and Dominion Of Canada. The Notice Of Claim Of Right included no less than twelve (12) citizens of the realm as signatories supporting the formation of the tribunal.

Between: Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. (plaintiff) & English Crown (defendant)
Proceeding Court: Canadian Nationalist Party Common Law Tribunal
Location: Redvers, Saskatchewan
File Number: CNPCLT13744

In the name of remedial self-determination, the Canadian Nationalist Party is seeking jurisdiction independent of the English Crown so that they may continue to exercise their religious freedom.

The following facts are to be considered authoritative truths regarding the history and present circumstances of the Canadian Nationalist Party, its candidates, and members:

Exclusion From Recent 43rd Federal Election:

1. During the recent 43rd Federal Election, the Canadian Nationalist Party requested, and was denied without exception, the liberty of being permitted to assemble publicly and communicate its electoral policies to voters. Not a single request to assemble and communicate our policies after the drop of the writ was honoured (September 11th – October 21^st, 2019).
2. Leading up to the election, the Canadian Nationalist Party was also ubiquitously denied access to publicly funded convention centers, university campuses, and libraries for reasons never justified.
3. To date, the Canadian Nationalist Party has been found to have violated no section of the Canada Elections Act nor have we violated any “hate speech” legislation nor incited violence at any public event whatsoever.
4. On September 27^th, 2019, the Canadian Nationalist Party requested a permit from the City Of Saskatoon to “host a public event to communicate our party policies to Canadian voters for the upcoming 43^rd Federal Election” on City Hall premises. Two days later, the City Of Saskatoon responded to the request by informing the Canadian Nationalist Party that they viewed the application “as an activity which is considered denominational” and therefore, would not honour the request.
5. The word “denominational” can be accurately defined as:
   1. founded, sponsored, or controlled by a particular religious denomination or sect.
   2. limited, conditioned, originating in, or influenced by the beliefs, attitudes, or interests of a religious sect, political party, etc.
6. The Canadian Nationalist Party describes itself as not only a political constituency, but a unique denomination of the Church, inspired by the Word of God to formulate policies which are in the public interest and seek election of office.
7. On the grounds that our electoral policies are inspired by lawfully recognized religious texts in circulation, the Canadian Nationalist Party views this denial as an infringement of their:
   • freedom of religion
   • democratic rights
   • self-determination
8. The Canadian Nationalist Party headquarters and City Of Saskatoon are both located in the Province Of Saskatchewan. The largest city (by population) in the province of our headquarters does not permit us to assemble publicly and communicate our policies to voters during an active election.
9. The Canadian Nationalist Party is the only federally-registered political party headquartered in Saskatchewan and one of only two headquartered in all of Western Canada. Violating the democratic viability of a such parties could potentially be contrary to the public interest.

The Canadian Nationalist Party maintains that these combined facts demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that our self-determination as a political constituency has been unlawfully infringed.

Court Of Queen’s Bench:

1. On September 11^th, 2020 our organization filed a Statement Of Claim with the Court Of Queen’s Bench For Saskatchewan in order to address the aforesaid constitutional violation (Canadian Charter Of Rights & Freedoms s. 2(a)(b)(c)) with the Canadian Nationalist Party acting as plaintiff and the City Of Saskatoon as defendant.
2. The Magna Carta of 1215 was listed as applicable legislation on the plaintiff’s Statement Of Claim.
3. On Thursday, November 5th, the Court Of Queens Bench For Saskatchewan held a hearing to decide if current Party Leader, Chief Agent, and Sole Director (Mr. Travis Patron) should be granted leave to continue serving as lawyer representing the Canadian Nationalist Party. During these proceedings, the Canadian Nationalist Party referred to their notice of application pursuant Rule 2-34(2) in favour of granting Mr. Patron leave to continue acting as lawyer on behalf of the corporation. In the application, we identified with the English Church as described by the Magna Carta and referenced a passage found within religious text (Book Of Judgement, Chapter XXXV, verse 1-9, OAHSPE Kosmon Bible).
4. On the same day, the Canadian Nationalist Party filed a motion to compel the Court Of Queen’s Bench to honour the Magna Carta of 1215.
5. Over 2 weeks have passed since this hearing and the Canadian Nationalist Party has not been informed as to any decision by the presiding Justice if Mr. Travis Patron should be granted leave to continue acting as lawyer.
6. In accordance with Magna Carta Clause 40, the Crown must not deny or delay right or justice to anyone. Failure to decide on the aforementioned application in a timely manner could potentially represent a negligence of duty and weigh in favour of the plaintiff.

Magna Carta (1215):

1. The Magna Carta was sealed by King John of the English Crown on June 15^th, in the year 1215 at Runnymede, between Windsor and Staines, over 800 years ago, and remains lawfully-binding upon the Crown. It was successfully invoked on March 23^rd, 2001 in accordance with Clause 61, and therefore, embodies the Supreme Law of the realm today. This charter was sealed and agreed upon before God, confirming that the English Church shall be free, shall have its rights undiminished, and shall have its liberties unimpaired. The English Crown, including heirs in perpetuity, is to observe this agreement in good faith and in accordance with their own free will – upholding the freedom of the Church’s elections as a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance.
2. The current Head Of State of the Dominion Of Canada is Queen Elizabeth II, who is an heir in perpetuity of the English Crown.

The above affirmations and claims are valid as to our lawful understanding, and which are sworn by on penalty of perjury and commercial liability.

Public Failure Of Journalistic Mandate:

1. The Canadian Nationalist Party has submitted a complaint to the Office Of The Ombudsman of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) alleging a violation of their stated mandate of Journalistic Standards and Practices (code of ethics) for neglecting to report on this constitutional violation or our civil court action which argues that, while espousing the ideology of nationalism, we have been (for all intents and purposes) excluded from the democratic channel during and leading up to the recent 43rd Federal Election.
2. The Canadian Nationalist Party did then propose an interview with CBC as a method of addressing the aforesaid complaint, which as of yet has been neither confirmed nor denied.

On the grounds that the English Crown confirms, to the honour of God, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired, granted by charter the freedom of the Church’s elections, and that this freedom shall be observed in good faith by heirs in perpetuity, the Canadian Nationalist Party hereby motions for summary judgement on the claim that, as a unique denomination of the English Church, the failure of the Crown to defend our religious freedom represents a breach of contract of the Magna Carta (1215).

May the Heavenly Host who holds the authority to arbitrate between the Canadian Nationalist Party and the English Crown do so with grace and righteousness.

Sworn by on this 21^st day of November, in the year 2020 at Redvers, Saskatchewan:

More information can be found at CNP v. R.

Case Information:

• Plaintiff Testimony: Statement Of Claim & Sworn Affidavit
• Exhibit A: 1215 Magna Carta (English Translation)
• Exhibit B: Letter Of Registration – Elections Canada
• Exhibit C: Civic Square Request – Canadian Nationalist Party
• Exhibit D: Civic Square Response – City Of Saskatoon
• Exhibit E: Definition Of Denominational – Dictionary.com LLC

Applicable Legislation:

• Magna Carta (1215)

Contact Information & Address For Service:

Plaintiff:
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc.
ATTN: Party Leader Travis Patron, Chief Agent
PO Box 490, Redvers, SK, S0C 2H0
+1(306)840-7132
www.nationalist.ca

Defendant:
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, English Crown
ATTN: Governor General Julie Payette, Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
Rideau Hall, 1 Sussex Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0A1
+1(613)993-8200
www.gg.ca