Categories
Activism News Statement

Why Won’t The City Of Saskatoon Face Travis Patron?

Is the City Of Saskatoon worried about being held accountable for denying a federally-sanctioned political party their constitutional rights?

Canadian Nationalist Party Suing City Of Saskatoon
In a lawsuit filed by the Canadian Nationalist Party, they claim that the City Of Saskatoon infringed their constitutional right to peacefully assemble and freely express themselves during the recent 43rd Federal Election (September 11th – October 21st, 2019).

During the recent 43rd Federal Election the Canadian Nationalist Party requested, and was denied ubiquitously, without exception, the liberty of being permitted to perform essentially the most fundamental procedure of any democratic society: the ability to host a public event and communicate policies to voters. The largest city in the province of the Canadian Nationalist Party headquarters, Saskatoon, has impaired their most fundamental right to democratic self-determination and religious freedom.

Now, the City Of Saskatoon is claiming that the corporation be required to appoint a lawyer from the Law Society Of Saskatchewan and that Sole Director, Chief Agent, and Party Leader Travis Patron is not eligible to serve as lawyer on file.

The City Of Saskatoon is attempting to further impair the self-determination of the Canadian Nationalist Party by claiming that Mr. Patron ought not to be allowed to represent the corporation, but the Court Of Queen’s Bench For Saskatchewan require a member of the Law Society Of Saskatchewan to be appointed in his stay.

In an application filed Monday, November 2nd, the Canadian Nationalist Party makes its case pursuant to Rule 2-34(2) of the Queens Bench Rules that Mr. Patron should be granted permission by the Court Of Queen’s Bench For Saskatchewan to continue acting as lawyer on file. The application references a number of legal precedents including the rights & liberties of the Church as defined by the Magna Carta of 1215 – something the City Of Saskatoon claims is “pseudolaw” and that the Magna Carta “has no force in Canada”.

The City Of Saskatoon claims that these arguments advanced by Travis Patron “represent a fundamental misunderstanding and ignorance of the law in Canada”.

The question then arises: if what Mr. Patron states represents a “fundamental misunderstand and ignorance of the law in Canada” why won’t the City Of Saskatoon simply face him in this claim? Surely the City Of Saskatoon will be able to win a claim if the lawyer representing the plaintiff is misunderstood and ignorant of Canadian law …

Is the City Of Saskatoon worried about being held to account for denying a federally-sanctioned political party their constitutional rights?

By Travis Patron

Canadian Nationalist Party Leader