We need a leader, not someone trying to limit Christmas gatherings.
People Of Saskatchewan,
Since Scott Moe declared a State Of Emergency in March of this year, we have been extremely patient (and perhaps naïve) with the provincial government’s handling of the so-called “COVID-19 pandemic”. Sentiments seem to have changed considerably following Moe’s re-election earlier this year as citizens are beginning to see that he is completely willing to restrict our freedom over a flu virus which has a survival rate of approximately 99%.
Scott Moe recently called out an anti-lockdown rally that was held in the provincial capital on Saturday, December 12th, for its alleged “racism”, even though the comment about Health Officer Saqib Shahab was about not being able to remember the names of foreigners. It is worth noting that whether or not someone is a foreign citizen (Shahab is obviously not), race does not necessarily factor – but Scott Moe will cry racism in order to avoid answering the calls of hundreds who attended, demanding the State Of Emergency be lifted. I myself attended and can say that the only thing more impressive than the turnout was the speakers themselves, who recognize that these measures are not truly in the interest of public health, but to bring forward, inch-by-inch, a world government surveillance state where your opinion is essentially meaningless and you are considered a tax-slave. If that’s the type of world you want to live in, then keep waiting for your next opportunity to vote because liberation simply isn’t on the ballot anymore.
We have watched a proposal for a 3-week lockdown in order to “flatten the curve” turn into a prolonged stretch lasting the entire year without a definite end in sight. Bill Gates, the Vaccine Predator, is saying this thing could last until 2022.
This government has went from imposing lockdown measures out of an “abundance of caution”, to fining people thousands of dollars for not wearing a mask at the local, public library. This is what oppression looks like. There is a coordinated media campaign to instill fear into the hearts of those who would think to stand up to these measures, yet fines mean nothing if they are constitutionally unenforceable in a court of law. We’ll take your unjustified, unconstitutional fines to court every single time – and we’ll tell the Judge what we think about them too.
Change starts here at home and when the business owners in this province (especially restaurant owners) want change bad enough, it will come. Let’s retake our province, then retake the entire federal constituency as well, and when we have accomplished that, maybe we’ll ask Denmark if they are willing to make a deal for Greenland (territorial jurisdiction is important to our success). In exchange, we’ll send them all the snakes who are currently in our mainstream media, spreading their deception by cherry-picking facts to fit their twisted narrative and hoping you’re too stupid to notice.
Let’s not buy into a narrative of fear over these holidays but recognize it for what it is: an important religious holiday for Catholics, a time to be with family, and an opportunity to express gratitude with what we have.
Kevin Weedmark of the Moosomin World-Spectator was served a court order to cease and desist publishing defamatory content about Canadian Nationalist Party Leader Travis Patron today.
The court of common law held reasonable grounds that media publications, which Weedmark is an owner of, have, following the recent 43rd Federal Election, falsely-accused Patron of engaging in criminality.
Weedmark has been served a court-ordered ban on further publication, dissemination, excerption, or summarization of information about the Canadian Nationalist Party which is defamatory and libelous in nature.
Failure to comply with this order may result in Weedmark being held criminally and/or commercially liable within the realm.
The Court Of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan won’t allow Travis Patron to represent the federally-sanctioned political party he founded and continues to lead.
The Judge presiding over the matter claims Patron is “not a lawyer” and has decided that the current Canadian Nationalist Party Leader, Chief Agent, and Sole Director is not eligible to represent the corporation.
The Judge further claims that until someone other than Patron is appointed to represent his party, no further action can take place, including filing material with the court, serving material on the defendant, bringing an application forward, engaging in discovery, participating in questioning, responding to an application or any other step.
The Canadian Nationalist Party was unconstitutionally excluded from the recent 43rd Federal Election after requesting and being denied (ubiquitously and without exception) the liberty of being permitted to host a public event and communicate their policies after the issue of the writ (September 11th – October 21st, 2019).
The Canadian Nationalist Party maintains that this represents a failure of the Government Of Canada to uphold their democratic mandate and that, after being excluded from both electoral and judicial proceedings, the Government Of Canada has, subsequently, forfeited personal jurisdiction over them.
The Court Of Queen’s Bench has yet to decide if Canadian Nationalist Party Leader Travis Patron should be granted leave to represent the corporation in their claim that they were unconstitutionally excluded from the recent 43rd Federal Election.
The Canadian Nationalist Party referenced an application to the court during a Court Of Queen’s Bench For Saskatchewan hearing on Thursday, November 5th, 2020 that the current name on file, Mr. Travis Patron, be granted leave to continue serving as lawyer in the civil action against the City Of Saskatoon. Mr. Patron is a practitioner of law. He also has direct experience related to the claim contained in the lawsuit and is acting under the lawful provisions contained within the Magna Carta of 1215 seeking justice in this claim. The Magna Carta of 1215 has been listed as applicable legislation in this claim and shall not go unnoticed. The Magna Carta is lawfully binding upon the Crown today, over 800 years after it was sealed at Runnymede by King John on June 15th, 1215 in the seventeenth year of his reign.
The Magna Carta was successfully invoked in accordance with Clause 61 on March 23rd, 2001, and continues to embody the supreme law of the whole realm today. All citizens of the realm have a lawful duty to recognize this agreement until the Crown has made redress. Any Crown Agent who, when called upon, fails to honour this treaty may be held criminally liable for aiding and abetting High Treason.
The Canadian Nationalist Party hereby reiterates that they identify with the English Church as described in the Magna Carta of 1215:
“First, that we have granted to God, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished and its liberties unimpaired. That we wish this so to be observed, appears from the fact that of our own free will, before the outbreak of the present dispute between us and our barons, we granted and confirmed by charter the freedom of the Church’s elections – a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance to it – and caused this to be confirmed by Pope Innocent III. This freedom we shall observe ourselves, and desire to be observed in good faith by our heirs in perpetuity.”
King John, English Crown, June 15th, 1215, Runnymede, Magna Carta
And further claim the following religious right:
“God said: Whoso liveth with Jehovih is free from Jehovih. These need no man’s government; for they practice righteousness, peace, love, industry and wisdom, with due regard to one another. Such is the Father’s kingdom on earth. In which there shall be no laws made by man; neither shall there be leaders or rulers. The progress of man is toward this; the progress of governments of man should shape toward such a consummation. The time was, when laws were requisite unto all things, even to the manner of a man coming in and going out of a house; and to every occupation that man followed; with licenses and taxes regulating them; the time of apprenticeship to a barber, to a weaver, to a lawyer, to a preacher, to a physician, to a smith, and to all other trades and occupations with examinations and passports to practice within the king’s dominions; with rates for fees and rights and privileges. But these laws and governments were for the past eras; they were righteous in the first place, for they shaped man’s judgement toward perfecting himself. But, behold, a new time is in the world; from the acquisition of knowledge a new liberty hath been born into the world. And it crieth out on every side: Throw open the doors unto all trades and occupations; behold, the multitude are sufficiently wise to judge themselves as to whom they shall patronize. Judgement is rendered against the laws and governments of man in all cases where they prevent the liberty and choice of man to his avocation and knowledge. It is not sufficient for thee to say: Behold, the public will be taken advantage of by ignorant pretenders. Thou hast no right to say what the public will suffer, and thus base a law on prospective damage. When the public have suffered, and when they themselves, demand protection by such laws, then shall such laws be made. To make such laws beforehand, is to sin against Jehovih.”
OAHSPE, Book Of Judgement, Chapter XXXV, verse 1-9
Mr. Patron holds sole directorship of the corporate entity Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. and is best suited to act on behalf of the corporation in public affairs. The Canadian Nationalist Party is a federally-sanctioned political party with Mr. Patron acting as Chief Agent and Party Leader. As current Sole Director, Chief Agent, and Party Leader there is no person better suited than Mr. Patron to act as lawyer on file and make decisions as it pertains to public representation of the Canadian Nationalist Party.
Denying Mr. Patron the ability to continue serving as lawyer on file given the provisions contained within the Magna Carta with regard to rights and liberties of the Church, would represent an impairment of our religious freedom.
It would also be neglectful of the inherent dignity of the human person and damage public confidence in social and political institutions which are designed to enhance participation in society.
The allegations against the current administration are most serious for the democratic and constitutional integrity of Canadian society. The Canadian Nationalist Party was not permitted to assemble publicly and communicate their policies during the recent 43rd Federal Election (September 11th – October 21st, 2019). Every request was denied. This exclusion provides reasonable grounds to claim that the Government Of Canada has failed to uphold their democratic mandate.
The City Of Saskatoon has already refused to honour the Canadian Nationalist Party’s request to host a public event on City Hall premises to communicate their policies during the recent 43rd Federal Election due to their denominational nature. A further refusal to grant the current lawyer on file, Travis Patron, to continue acting as such, represents a continuation of impairment of their religious freedom.
In accordance with Clause 40 of the Magna Carta, the Crown must not delay nor deny right or justice to any citizen of the realm.
These combined circumstances of delaying Canadian Nationalist Party Leader Travis Patron’s application to represent the corporation as lawyer in their civil action (a religious right) after being unconstitutionally excluded from the recent 43rd Federal Election represents a failure to honour the contractual provisions contained within the Magna Carta of 1215.
Being a member of the Law Society Of Saskatchewan is not an absolute requirement to represent a corporation in a court of law.
In the name of Jehovih, the Heavenly Father, the Canadian Nationalist Party is motioning to the Common Law for jurisdiction independent of the English Crown and current heirs in perpetuity as a remedy in this claim.
May the Heavenly Host with the authority to arbitrate between the Canadian Nationalist Party and English Crown do so with grace and righteousness.
Sworn by on this 1st day of December, 2020 in Redvers, Saskatchewan:
Plaintiff: Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. ATTN: Party Leader Travis Patron, Chief Agent PO Box 490, Redvers, SK, S0C 2H0 +1(306)840-7132 www.nationalist.ca Defendant: Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, English Crown ATTN: Governor General Julie Payette, Office of the Secretary to the Governor General Rideau Hall, 1 Sussex Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0A1 +1(613)993-8200 www.gg.ca
TO: Kevin Hengen Superintendent of Schools East Service Area South East Cornerstone Public School Division 80A-18th Street Northeast, Weyburn, Saskatchewan S4H 2W4
FROM: Travis Patron Canadian Nationalist Party PO Box 490, Redvers, Saskatchewan S0C 2H0
DATE: Monday, November 30th, 2020
South East Cornerstone Public School Division – Response Letter
This is an acknowledgement that we have received your recent letter referencing a potential violation of s. 367 of The Education Act, 1995 by alleging acting with rude or indecent behaviour when we attended the Redvers School on Tuesday, November 24th, 2020. Let me first and foremost object to the accusation that we conducted ourselves rudely or indecently. We have not. There is nothing rude or indecent about objecting to an unconstitutional provincial mandate requiring the use of masks in public schools. There is nothing rude or indecent about raising one’s voice in the face of oppression either, and this is how we currently characterize the government administration at the provincial level and beyond.
In March of this year, we served the Government Of Saskatchewan a Notice Of Objection in regard to their declared state of emergency on the grounds that is it unprecedented and unnecessary and that it has a high probability of causing undo suppression of our economic conditions – especially in rural areas of the province. We believe these words to be self-evident today and intend on continuing to stand in objection to this declared state of emergency.
We interpret your immediate decision to prohibit us from entering the school or being on school property in response to our activism (read: inquiring in-person about a public schools mask policy) as relatively undiplomatic and perhaps even unbecoming of a superintendent dealing with a federal party leader headquartered in the municipality. No effort to listen to our perspective or address our questions has been made whatsoever. This is disappointing to us.
Mandating masks in public facilities, including for staff and students at school is uncalled for and unnecessary unless the current government administration is able to justify them.
I’m willing to bet that if an anonymous poll were held today, the majority of students and staff alike would vehemently reject mandatory masks.
As an alumni, this is not the first time I’ve raised my voice at Redvers School in objection to something I believe to be fundamentally wrong (mandatory masks) and if I have my way, it most certainly won’t be the last …