Categories
Notice Testimony Tribunal

Motion For Summary Judgement [CNP v. R.]

The plaintiff (Canadian Nationalist Party) is today motioning to the court for summary judgement regarding their claim that the defendant (English Crown) has committed breach of contract by failing to defend the rights and liberties of the Church as described in the Magna Carta of 1215.

Court proceedings come through a Common Law Tribunal formed on April 28th, 2020 by public declaration served to the municipality of Redvers, district of Souris – Moose Mountain, Province Of Saskatchewan, and Dominion Of Canada. The Notice Of Claim Of Right included no less than twelve (12) citizens of the realm as signatories supporting the formation of the tribunal.

Between: Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. (plaintiff) & English Crown (defendant)
Proceeding Court: Canadian Nationalist Party Common Law Tribunal
Location: Redvers, Saskatchewan
File Number: CNPCLT13744

In the name of remedial self-determination, the Canadian Nationalist Party is seeking jurisdiction independent of the English Crown so that they may continue to exercise their religious freedom.

The following facts are to be considered authoritative truths regarding the history and present circumstances of the Canadian Nationalist Party, its candidates, and members:

Exclusion From Recent 43rd Federal Election:

  1. During the recent 43rd Federal Election, the Canadian Nationalist Party requested, and was denied without exception, the liberty of being permitted to assemble publicly and communicate its electoral policies to voters. Not a single request to assemble and communicate our policies after the drop of the writ was honoured (September 11th – October 21st, 2019).
  2. Leading up to the election, the Canadian Nationalist Party was also ubiquitously denied access to publicly funded convention centers, university campuses, and libraries for reasons never justified.
  3. To date, the Canadian Nationalist Party has been found to have violated no section of the Canada Elections Act nor have we violated any “hate speech” legislation nor incited violence at any public event whatsoever.
  4. On September 27th, 2019, the Canadian Nationalist Party requested a permit from the City Of Saskatoon to “host a public event to communicate our party policies to Canadian voters for the upcoming 43rd Federal Election” on City Hall premises. Two days later, the City Of Saskatoon responded to the request by informing the Canadian Nationalist Party that they viewed the application “as an activity which is considered denominational” and therefore, would not honour the request.
  5. The word “denominational” can be accurately defined as:
    1. founded, sponsored, or controlled by a particular religious denomination or sect.
    2. limited, conditioned, originating in, or influenced by the beliefs, attitudes, or interests of a religious sect, political party, etc.
  6. The Canadian Nationalist Party describes itself as not only a political constituency, but a unique denomination of the Church, inspired by the Word of God to formulate policies which are in the public interest and seek election of office.
  7. On the grounds that our electoral policies are inspired by lawfully recognized religious texts in circulation, the Canadian Nationalist Party views this denial as an infringement of their:
    • freedom of religion
    • democratic rights
    • self-determination
  8. The Canadian Nationalist Party headquarters and City Of Saskatoon are both located in the Province Of Saskatchewan. The largest city (by population) in the province of our headquarters does not permit us to assemble publicly and communicate our policies to voters during an active election.
  9. The Canadian Nationalist Party is the only federally-registered political party headquartered in Saskatchewan and one of only two headquartered in all of Western Canada. Violating the democratic viability of a such parties could potentially be contrary to the public interest.

The Canadian Nationalist Party maintains that these combined facts demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that our self-determination as a political constituency has been unlawfully infringed.

Court Of Queen’s Bench:

  1. On September 11th, 2020 our organization filed a Statement Of Claim with the Court Of Queen’s Bench For Saskatchewan in order to address the aforesaid constitutional violation (Canadian Charter Of Rights & Freedoms s. 2(a)(b)(c)) with the Canadian Nationalist Party acting as plaintiff and the City Of Saskatoon as defendant.
  2. The Magna Carta of 1215 was listed as applicable legislation on the plaintiff’s Statement Of Claim.
  3. On Thursday, November 5th, the Court Of Queens Bench For Saskatchewan held a hearing to decide if current Party Leader, Chief Agent, and Sole Director (Mr. Travis Patron) should be granted leave to continue serving as lawyer representing the Canadian Nationalist Party. During these proceedings, the Canadian Nationalist Party referred to their notice of application pursuant Rule 2-34(2) in favour of granting Mr. Patron leave to continue acting as lawyer on behalf of the corporation. In the application, we identified with the English Church as described by the Magna Carta and referenced a passage found within religious text (Book Of Judgement, Chapter XXXV, verse 1-9, OAHSPE Kosmon Bible).
  4. On the same day, the Canadian Nationalist Party filed a motion to compel the Court Of Queen’s Bench to honour the Magna Carta of 1215.
  5. Over 2 weeks have passed since this hearing and the Canadian Nationalist Party has not been informed as to any decision by the presiding Justice if Mr. Travis Patron should be granted leave to continue acting as lawyer.
  6. In accordance with Magna Carta Clause 40, the Crown must not deny or delay right or justice to anyone. Failure to decide on the aforementioned application in a timely manner could potentially represent a negligence of duty and weigh in favour of the plaintiff.

Magna Carta (1215):

  1. The Magna Carta was sealed by King John of the English Crown on June 15th, in the year 1215 at Runnymede, between Windsor and Staines, over 800 years ago, and remains lawfully-binding upon the Crown. It was successfully invoked on March 23rd, 2001 in accordance with Clause 61, and therefore, embodies the Supreme Law of the realm today. This charter was sealed and agreed upon before God, confirming that the English Church shall be free, shall have its rights undiminished, and shall have its liberties unimpaired. The English Crown, including heirs in perpetuity, is to observe this agreement in good faith and in accordance with their own free will – upholding the freedom of the Church’s elections as a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance.
  2. The current Head Of State of the Dominion Of Canada is Queen Elizabeth II, who is an heir in perpetuity of the English Crown.

The above affirmations and claims are valid as to our lawful understanding, and which are sworn by on penalty of perjury and commercial liability.

Public Failure Of Journalistic Mandate:

  1. The Canadian Nationalist Party has submitted a complaint to the Office Of The Ombudsman of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) alleging a violation of their stated mandate of Journalistic Standards and Practices (code of ethics) for neglecting to report on this constitutional violation or our civil court action which argues that, while espousing the ideology of nationalism, we have been (for all intents and purposes) excluded from the democratic channel during and leading up to the recent 43rd Federal Election.
  2. The Canadian Nationalist Party did then propose an interview with CBC as a method of addressing the aforesaid complaint, which as of yet has been neither confirmed nor denied.

On the grounds that the English Crown confirms, to the honour of God, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired, granted by charter the freedom of the Church’s elections, and that this freedom shall be observed in good faith by heirs in perpetuity, the Canadian Nationalist Party hereby motions for summary judgement on the claim that, as a unique denomination of the English Church, the failure of the Crown to defend our religious freedom represents a breach of contract of the Magna Carta (1215).

May the Heavenly Host who holds the authority to arbitrate between the Canadian Nationalist Party and the English Crown do so with grace and righteousness.

Sworn by on this 21st day of November, in the year 2020 at Redvers, Saskatchewan:

Mr. Travis Mitchell Patron, Canadian Nationalist Party Leader

More information can be found at CNP v. R.

Case Information:

Applicable Legislation:

Contact Information & Address For Service:

Plaintiff:
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc.
ATTN: Party Leader Travis Patron, Chief Agent
PO Box 490, Redvers, SK, S0C 2H0
+1(306)840-7132
www.nationalist.ca

Defendant:

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, English Crown
ATTN: Governor General Julie Payette, Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
Rideau Hall, 1 Sussex Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0A1
+1(613)993-8200
www.gg.ca

Categories
Activism News Statement

CBC Failing To Uphold Journalistic Mandate

CBC Failing To Uphold Journalistic Mandate
*Disclaimer: the following is a follow-up to the recent Canadian Nationalist Party complaint submitted to the Office Of The Ombudsman alleging a violation of their stated mandate of Journalistic Standards and Practices – code of ethics and practice.

Office Of The Ombudsman,

My main point of contention lies with the idea that CBC, as a publicly-funded media broadcaster, has paid no attention whatsoever to the fact that a federal political party espousing the ideology of nationalism has been (for all intents and purposes) excluded from the democratic channel during and leading up to the recent 43rd Federal Election. It is unacceptable to justify this lack of coverage by claiming that the Canadian Nationalist Party is a “small party” and therefore does not warrant this kind of coverage when the subject-matter at hand demonstrates it is essentially impossible to grow any party who is not permitted to host public events and communicate their policies during an active election. This is a fundamental violation of our constitutional rights and self-determination.

In terms of mandate, the CBC is obligated to report on current affairs within the country which are in the public interest. The aforementioned claim is indeed in the public interest because Canadian citizens are not only being kept in the dark about the electoral policies of a federal political party but they are being denied meaningful representation when it comes to the ideology of nationalism. To not report on the exclusion of the ideology of nationalism from democratic proceedings in Canada is contrary to the public interest.

The Canadian Nationalist Party currently has active lawsuits in court regarding these claims. This too is in the public interest to know about – yet no coverage whatsoever has been brought to these very important issues which relate to the democratic and constitutional integrity of our society.

The willful lack of coverage of these developments, combined with the track record of CBC ubiquitously reporting negatively-oriented information about the same political party, provide reasonable grounds to conclude that our publicly-funded media broadcaster has departed from its mandate of journalistic integrity and balanced reporting

Therefore, unless they can make amends and keep Canadians informed of these very serious violations against our democratic and constitutional integrity, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation cannot be said to be acting in the public interest and should not expect the support of taxpaying citizens.

Signed,

Travis Patron, Canadian Nationalist Party Leader
Categories
Activism News Statement

Why Won’t The City Of Saskatoon Face Travis Patron?

Canadian Nationalist Party Suing City Of Saskatoon
In a lawsuit filed by the Canadian Nationalist Party, they claim that the City Of Saskatoon infringed their constitutional right to peacefully assemble and freely express themselves during the recent 43rd Federal Election (September 11th – October 21st, 2019).

During the recent 43rd Federal Election the Canadian Nationalist Party requested, and was denied ubiquitously, without exception, the liberty of being permitted to perform essentially the most fundamental procedure of any democratic society: the ability to host a public event and communicate policies to voters. The largest city in the province of the Canadian Nationalist Party headquarters, Saskatoon, has impaired their most fundamental right to democratic self-determination and religious freedom.

Now, the City Of Saskatoon is claiming that the corporation be required to appoint a lawyer from the Law Society Of Saskatchewan and that Sole Director, Chief Agent, and Party Leader Travis Patron is not eligible to serve as lawyer on file.

The City Of Saskatoon is attempting to further impair the self-determination of the Canadian Nationalist Party by claiming that Mr. Patron ought not to be allowed to represent the corporation, but the Court Of Queen’s Bench For Saskatchewan require a member of the Law Society Of Saskatchewan to be appointed in his stay.

In an application filed Monday, November 2nd, the Canadian Nationalist Party makes its case pursuant to Rule 2-34(2) of the Queens Bench Rules that Mr. Patron should be granted permission by the Court Of Queen’s Bench For Saskatchewan to continue acting as lawyer on file. The application references a number of legal precedents including the rights & liberties of the Church as defined by the Magna Carta of 1215 – something the City Of Saskatoon claims is “pseudolaw” and that the Magna Carta “has no force in Canada”.

The City Of Saskatoon claims that these arguments advanced by Travis Patron “represent a fundamental misunderstanding and ignorance of the law in Canada”.

The question then arises: if what Mr. Patron states represents a “fundamental misunderstand and ignorance of the law in Canada” why won’t the City Of Saskatoon simply face him in this claim? Surely the City Of Saskatoon will be able to win a claim if the lawyer representing the plaintiff is misunderstood and ignorant of Canadian law …

Is the City Of Saskatoon worried about being held to account for denying a federally-sanctioned political party their constitutional rights?